RAMSAR SITE: THREATS AND
OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT By Rabin Bastola
Introduction
Ramsar Sites are nationally
designated and internationally recognized wetlands (Simsar)
under the Ramsar Convention. Wetlands are
important ecosystems, which are rich in biodiversity. Their values in
terms of direct and indirect use, functional values and bequest values
are now widely appreciated. Their importance at the global level was
first appreciated at the Convention on Wetlands of International
Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat, held at Ramsar, a city in
Iran in 1971. Since then several wetlands of international importance
have been listed as Ramsar Sites. All the countries, which are
signatories of the convention, are obliged to designate at least one
wetland in their respective territory as a Ramsar Site.
There are presently 130
Contracting Parties to the Convention, with 1109 wetland sites,
totaling 87.25 million hectares, designated for inclusion in the
Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. Nepal
acceded to the Ramsar Convention on 17 April 1988, and Koshi Tappu
region was included on the Ramsar list of Wetlands of International
Importance, commonly called Ramsar Site. As yet Koshi Tappu is the
only Ramsar Site of Nepal to be included in the list of Wetlands of
International Importance.
The Ramsar
Convention on Wetlands, is an intergovernmental treaty that provides
the framework for national action and international cooperation for
the conservation and wise use of wetlands and their resources. To
achieve this, the Convention places general obligations on states
which are contracting parties relating to the conservation of wetlands
throughout their territory, and special obligations pertaining to
those wetlands which have been designated for the "List of
Wetlands of International Importance"
Wetland
Resources of Nepal
Wetlands are essential for the protection of endangered and threatened
species. Wetlands in Nepal are rich in bio-diversity. This statement
can be verified by the presence of 172 species of fish, and 190
wetland dependent birds (out of 850 species of birds of Nepal) (See
Table 1). Moreover, the aquatic reptiles and the mammals have also
played a vital role in the diversification of the faunal varieties
throughout the Nepalese wetlands.
Nepal's
wetland is characterized by the floral diversity more than the faunal
diversity. Twenty-five percent of the 7,000 species of plants recorded
in Nepal are aquatic. Of the 700 species of endemic plants, 27 are
rare, seven are threatened, and nine are endangered species of endemic
plants.
TABLE 1:
MIGRATORY WATERFOWLS KNOWN TO USE NEPALESE WETLANDS
|
TYPE
OF WATERFOWL
|
NUMBER OF SPECIES
|
PER
CENT
|
|
Migratory species
|
90
|
47%
|
|
Resident species
|
66
|
35%
|
|
Uncommon and rare resident
species
|
34
|
18%
|
|
Total
|
190
|
100%
|
Wetland Area Legislation in
Nepal
The
Jalachar
Sanrachhan Ain - 2017 (Aquatic Life Protection, 1961) is one
of Nepal's oldest pieces of legislation indicating the early
recognition of wetlands and aquatic life values. It prohibits the use
of poison and explosive substances in water bodies, but this Act
remains ineffective as nobody has been prosecuted for violating the
Act. It does not specify an agency to administer or enforce the Act.
Much
of the legislation concerning protected areas is irrelevant to wetland
habitats. The National
Park and Wildlife Conservation Act (1973)
provides a legal basis for Nepal's conservation program. The national
park and wildlife program were initiated in 1974 to control hunting
and restrict wild animal trade in accordance with the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of wild flora and
fauna, of which Nepal is a signatory. Other relevant regulations
include the Royal
Chitwan National Park Regulation (1975), Himalayan Mountain National Park (1979), and Khaptad
National Park Regulation (1982).
Nepal
is signatory to IUCN-The World Conservation Union, the World Wildlife
Fund, CITES, and the Convention on Wetlands of International
Importance (the Ramsar Convention) in 1978. Nepal has not yet joined
the convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species (CMS) of Wild
Animals (the Bonn Convention).
Concept
of Community Development
The concept of community
development was elaborated as early as in the 1940s by the British
colonial government as a process intended "to
mobilize the labor of rural communities in support of national
government objectives to build social and physical infra-structures
and increases self reliance".
It was applied in many sectors
in Nepal over the last few decades. Almost all of the development
programs in Nepal are based on the community development model. It is
applied in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife reserve.
The declaration of the Koshi Tappu area as a Ramsar Site
has brought many negative as well as positive impacts in terms of the
community development process.
Nepal's Ramsar Site: Koshi Tappu
Koshi
Tappu is situated in the Eastern Development Region along the Koshi
River passing through the districts of Udaipur, Sunsari and Saptari.
Twelve Village Development Committees (VDCs) from these districts
surround it. The total population of these VDCs is 69,598 with a
population growth rate of 2.8 percent.
The Reserve lies on the alluvial
floodplain of the Sapta Koshi (or simply Koshi) river and is fed by
seven major tributaries: Indrawati, Bhote Koshi (Sun Koshi), Tama
Koshi, Dudh Koshi, Likhu, Arun and Tamor.
Three rivers, the Koshi, Gandaki and Karnali and their
tributaries drain the country. These are all perennial rivers that
flow through varied ranges running in east-west direction. The Koshi
river system is considered to be the largest one in the country. Its
wide and fertile floodplain houses Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, the
only Ramsar Site of Nepal.
Koshi
Tappu Wildlife Reserve has many wetland habitats such as river,
streams, waterfalls, oxbow lakes, freshwater lakes and ponds, riverine
marsh, seasonally flooded grassland, reservoir, riverine floodplain,
freshwater swamp, river flats, swamps dominated by cattail, and so on.
The
area is the last remaining habitat of wild water buffalo, called Arna
(Bubalus babalis), ancestor
to the domestic buffalo. Their number is about 100 to 150. It was
reported that over 50,000 waterfowls were recorded at one time in
mid-February. It also houses endangered Gangetic dolphin (Platanista
gangetica). Blue bull (Boselaphus
tragocamelus) is also found in the Reserve. The site is an
important wintering and staging ground for Trans-Himalayan migratory
birds including endangered species of swamp partridge (Francolinus
gularis) and most threatened species of Bengal floricon (Houbaropsis
bengalensis) in the world and other two species at risk;
changeable hawk eagle (Spizaetus cirrhatus), and dusky eagle owl (Bubo coromandus). About 325 bird species are recorded in the area.
This is about 39 percent of the total bird species recorded in Nepal.
The Use of the Ramsar Site
i. Thatch Grass and Fodder Collection: The site is extensively used
by local people for collecting thatch grass for roofing their shelters
and gathering grass and fodders for their livestock. On an average 200
people go inside the Reserve to collect grasses in a day.
Every winter in January and
February, local people are given permit for two weeks to collect
thatch grasses from inside the Reserve. During this time period people
make temporary shelters near the Koshi River and collect as much
thatch grass as possible and carry home on ox-driven cart. ln 1987,
about 28,400 tickets were sold. The price of a ticket was Rs.1. During
the period of the week, the average number of days people visited was
11 and the average number of loads per person per day was 3. Recent
information on grass cutters suggests that its number is relatively
decreasing and only about 12,000 took permission to collect grasses in
1993. The drop in the number of grass cutter is due to lack of good
thatch grasses as livestock tramples it and there has been a change in
the pattern of vegetation in the Reserve.
ii. Fishing: Fishing is a common and important practice inside the
Reserve, particularly in the Koshi Rivers and riverine marshes, swamps
and seasonally flooded grassland, ditches and ponds. Usually, fishing
is done in a group with cast nets and long thin nets. In the barrage
area, fisherfolk generally use gill nets, mesh nets and cast nets. The
Tharu people also harvest snail (Macrochlamys
tugurium) from the area.
iii. Fuel-wood collection: Local people collect animal dung to
prepare dung-cake to use as fuel-wood for cooking, and heating
purposes. Generally, fresh dung is mixed with rice husk and prepared a
cake stick. Local people also use the Reserve for collecting fuel-wood
for their household consumption. Carrying a load of dry fuel-wood on
the head of an indigenous woman and on the back of a hill migrant is a
common scene near the Reserve. Due to population growth, there has
been a shortage of fuel-wood in the area and more pressure is on the
Reserve.
iv. Cultural
uses: The local people to perform various religious as well as
cultural rituals collect Lotus leaves. These leaves are also used as
leaf plate in the feast and packing material in the local markets. The
rivers are considered sacred in Hindu religion and bathing in the
river, particularly, in the confluence is a religious practice to earn
merit for eternal peace. The river is also used for feasting in
rituals and ceremonies.
v. Irrigated
Agriculture: Temporary barriers partially across the rivers
are built to irrigate rice fields. Building such barrier is a
community effort. In the monsoon season, these barriers are easily
washed away by flood. Also, the water that leeches out of the river is
used to provide irrigation to the rice fields. Rice is the main staple
food of Nepal and owning a rice field is considered a prestigious
status. The rice seedlings are raised in the nursery and transplanted
in the field during the month of July, when there is an abundance of
water in the field. Also, local people of a small islet, called Lanka
on the north of the Koshi River grow pointed gourd (Trichosanthes
dioica). The floodplain is fertile and good for the cultivation of
pointed gourd. These gourds are sold at local hat bazaars. The surplus
gourds are transported to the Kathmandu valley and nearby towns.
vi. Driftwood:
The fuelwood requirement of the communities is partially fulfilled by
the collection of driftwood that is brought by the river at the time
of the rainy season. The driftwood collection is one of the common
practices to generate additional cash income.
vii. Rocks
and Boulder Collection: Rocks and Boulders collected from the
bed of the river as well as the quarry along the river are broken into
pebble to built house with concrete mixture. The migrants, mainly from
hilly regions, are engaged in this activity. Also rocks and bolder are
collected from the rivers to build houses.
viii. Livestock
Raising and Grazing: Animal husbandry is one of the vital
components of local economy. People tend buffalo and cattle to meet
their basic food and monetary needs through the sale of meat, milk and
milk products, manure and use their males as draft animals. Only
milking animals are kept stall-fed. Others are herded daily for
grazing inside the park. It is believed that some 15-20 thousand
cattle and buffaloes are resident in the Reserve.
|
Box 1. Inviolable Rights to Graze Animals: Grazing
is not allowed inside the Reserve/Site. However, local communities
have been grazing their buffaloes and livestock in the area for almost
7-8 generations and continue to do so, despite changed regulations.
There are about l00 families that keep their animals inside the
Reserve. They consider it their inalienable rights to use the reserve
area.
(According to local informant) |
ix. Cattail Collection: Ethnic groups called Bantars (they like
to be called Sirdar) are engaged in cattail (Typah sp.) collection and mattress making in the area. These people
harvest good leaves of cattail from the drowned area of the Reserve as
well as from the barrage area. Women and children collect them in a
place and dry and cure them under the sun. Once they are dried, they
are bundled and stored to build mattress. A special wooden handle and
grass ropes are used to set up a loom to weave cattail mattress.
Mostly women are engaged to weave mattresses, whereas men collect raw
materials. Mattresses are taken to the local market on a bicycle and
sold for Rs.15 to 40 per piece. The local markets are held on
different locations on different days of the week.
Strategies
for Wetland Management
An
appropriate strategy of wetlands management must be formulated at the
policy level involving all the organizations concerned with their
conservation. Strategies for their management, conservation,
rehabilitation and sustained use of wetland resources are suggested
below:
·
Identify
critical wetland habitats and declare them protected areas
·
Enact
legislation for the conservation and sustainable use of wetlands
·
Develop
an institutional framework for wetlands management
·
Provide
practical training to wetland users, motivators, and policy makers
·
Manage
wetlands with an inter-sectoral and interdisciplinary approach
·
Encourage
local clubs, NGOs and professional groups to become involved in
wetland management
·
Incorporate
community participation into wetlands management
·
Protect
the rights of wetland users
·
Provide
extension services to users for wetland improvement
·
Design
primary, secondary, and tertiary curricula to incorporate wetland
studies
·
Strengthen
channels of communication for public awareness campaigns regarding
wetland use and conservation
Issues
in the Management of Wetlands
No
unified approach exists for the sustainable utilization of wetland
resources. Basic issues plaguing planners and implementers of wetlands
management programs are:
Ownership
Of Wetlands
No law
exists for a single institution to claim priority over wetlands. A
wetland in a forest is under the jurisdiction of three different
agencies: fisheries, water resources, and forestry.
Lack
Of Awareness
Wetlands
are not legitimized as a valuable ecosystem, nor are they recognized
as a significant component of the ecosystem. They are converted into
agricultural land as soon as access to them is claimed.
Impact
Of Externalities
There are
always adverse impacts from externalities such as fertilizer and
pesticide runoff from agricultural land that pollutes rivers, lakes,
reservoirs, creeks and ponds. Deforestation and industrial development
in the catchment areas cause serious siltation of wetlands.
Lack
Of Policy
No definite
policy on wetlands exists in Nepal.
Lack
Of A Responsible Institution No institution in Nepal has a program with a single focus on wetlands
management.
Interpretation
and Analysis
It
can be argued that the local peoples are one of the major determinants
of the value of protected areas (Ramsar Site). But the role of
community development in expanding public support for protected
areas/site is a source of many debates. Conflict stems from the desire
to both preserve natural settings and to allow people access to them.
Conflict
concerning protected areas and the local people also revolves around
the resource protection versus development debate. However, actual
conflict usually occurs not within the protected area itself, but in
the interface between the park boundary and the surrounding area.
The situation of the community
cannot improve much in the direction of more just, equitable and
sustainable society unless unified approaches to incorporate the
poorer section of the community are implemented, and these communities
are provided with the access to projects and programs. As has occurred
in other areas, it was the local elite who benefited most from this
(declaration of Koshi Tappu as a Ramsar Site). The poorer section of
the communities again had almost no access to the inputs of the
projects and program.
And again, national bureaucracies failed to consider
particular and specific local conditions in the planning and
decision-making of community development efforts. The heterogeneity
among the people in that site is disguised in the single name of 'community'.
In so doing considerable confusion has resulted.
Caste, class, and gender issues are frequently talked
about but often nothing is done. This situation has had the effect of
exacerbating poverty. Local people are treated as the outsiders and
the outsiders who came after the declaration of Koshi Tappu as a
Ramsar Site are often taken as the local in that site. Since local
people are isolated from their resource, we cannot say it creates
opportunities for community development.
All of the above facts about the use of the Ramsar site by
the local people gives us an idea about the need of proper management
systems to incorporate the positive impact of the Ramsar Site upon the
Community's Development.
The possible ways to use the Site/Park in a sustainable
way has become an extreme necessity to promote the Community's welfare
in terms of the resource uses. Policies should be formulated in such a
way that the gradual phase-out of the community's use of the Ramsar
Site be implemented in order to carry on the value and prospects of
the Conservation of the Wetland of International Importance.
Conclusion
Site –people interactions in the Koshi Tappu Ramsar Site
were studied extensively through a variety of economic, social,
scientific and attitudinal surveys. The site/reserve had been
established for the conservation of wild Buffalo and migratory
water-fowl, and protect some of the most important wetland habitat in
Nepal; it is therefore vital for the conservation of Bio-diversity on
a Regional, National and Global level. However the results showed that
the people in the area are dependent on the reserve for natural
resources, the exploitation of which may be inimical to the
achievement of conservation goals. Other products, such as fuel-wood,
edible and medicinal plants and seeds are occasionally collected
legally in the Reserve/Site.
Despite some measurable benefits, attitudes about the
Reserve/Site are generally poor in the region, at least among local
inhabitants who do not understand its major importance. The best
predictors of attitudes were the caste or ethnic groups and the
literacy rate of the family of the respondents, and not the
socio-economic standing of, or the direct cost to, the respondent due
to crop damage by Wildlife. These results suggest that religious
inculcation, societal discrimination and education may all play a role
in shaping attitudes and therefore influencing Park/Site-people
relations. Short-term solutions to Site-People conflicts should
include more education and extension programs on the part of the
site's management, and legal efforts to return some control to local
villages.
References
1.Bhandari, Bishnu. 1994. Wetland
Biodiversity in Nepal: A Case Study of Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve.
. Public
Awareness of Biodiversity in Wetlands in Asia. Part I and II. Tokyo:
Ramsar Center Japan.
2.Singh, Ganga Ram. 1994. Summary
Status of Nepal's Ramsar Site. Safeguarding Wetlands in Nepal.
. .
Edited by Bishnu Bhandari, T.B.Shrestha and John McEachern.
3. A paper presented at the International Wetlands Symposium held in
Yatsu-Higata
Ramsar Site,
Japan, organized by Narashino City and Ramsar Center Japan, 28-29
October 1995.
4. "An
Inventory of Nepal's Terai Wetlands" compiled by Dr. Bishnu
Bhandari published by IUCN
. Nepal.
5.
Sah, J. P. 1997.
Koshi Tappu Wetlands: Nepal's Ramsar Site
6.
Excerpts from Internet
Wetland
is translated as simsar in Nepali. Sim is a derivative of a Persian
word Sih, which means low-grade land not suitable for cultivation. Sar
is a Sanskrit word meaning water.
♣
Wetland (Simsar)
is the Land mass saturated with water due to high water table either
through groundwater, atmospheric precipitation or inundation. It may
be natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, static or flowing,
and fresh or brackish (Shrestha and Bhandari, 1992)
|